Skip to main content

Virtual machines vs. Containers

One of the questions that often comes up to anybody who's in the cloud space is, what are the differences between virtual machines and container? When should use one versus the other?

Unfortunately the answer is not so simple clear-cut. We can't say you should always use containers or always use virtual machines. But, there are some things to keep in mind.

There are certain kinds of applications which benefit from running in containers or using micro services in general. Microservices means taking an application and decomposing it into smaller parts. This is really good if you need to build a web scale application and you need to have the ability to turn up different dials of performance somewhat independent of each other. For example, take the middleware piece or the front end or the database piece and you need to scale them individually. The other benefit of containers is a consistency between the development environment and the production environment where you can take things easily form one to the other without major alterations. That being said there are some things about containers that are very different. They're not just smaller leaner virtual machines.

Some of the biggest differences have to do with persistent storage. So, in a container needs to have the storage living outside of itself somewhere else. So, if you build an application in containers you need to have the database, that's the persistent part of the application living elsewhere.

The other part gives into container lifecycle management is that you don't patch containers. Because, there's no internal storage, there's no benefit to deploying a patch to the container to bring it down for a while and bring it up. Actually with containers when you have a new version of the container or you need to update it in some way, you actually replace it. There are some ways to do this involving, for example, orchestration tools like kubernetes. They can do rolling updates but the most important concept you need to understand is that when a container gets updated you actually kill the old container and bringing a new one. Because all the data is stored over somewhere else. It's okay to re-attach it to data and that's what  get moving forward.

When it comes to think about it from a bigger picture you should ask yourself why do I want to use containers and what'll I benefit from it. In some cases, for example, a CRM application or a Marketing automation application that's used by a department may be easier to leave it inside of a virtual machine. Because it doesn't need to scale, it doesn't have a high rate of change and more importantly it will work on your existing infrastructure.

Containers really going to be beneficial when we have an application that's really important to perform at it's best and a high level of scale or that you're going to be updating it a lot because it's important to the business.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Face to Face Interview for 5+ years experienced .Net Developers

Interviewer: Hi Loganathan, Good morning. How are you? Me: Great, How are you? Interviewer: I'm good. Can brief about yourself? Me: Well, I started my career with .Net framework 2.0 then worked on 3.5 and 4.0 frameworks as well. So, I can work on any frameworks. I've no chance to develop a desktop application. From the begining I'm working as a pure Web developer. Initially started with ASP.Net web applications development and moved to Silverlight applications. I've well experience in C#, SQL Server 2005/2008 and WCF. I used Microsoft Enterprise Library Application blocks and LINQ in my applications. I worked in both Waterfall model and Agile model environments. Currently working as a Senior Developer. My roles and responsibilities are developing controls in Silverlight, writing WCF methods and consuming them in our applications, writing new stored procedures or modifying, doing unit testing and code review. Interviewer: Great, Can you explain about your curren...

Large Volume of Dataset Transfer from WCF to Silverlight

Most of the times the developers, architects have the problem to retrieve large volume of data from WCF Service to Silverlight client applications. It’s a big head ache for developers. But it’s not up to that much problematic one. We can solve this problem by changing some property’s values in Web.config of WCF Service host, Silverlight application’s ServiceReference.clientconfig and Silverlight XAP hosted ASP.Net Applications. Here I’m going to explain the Web.config changes we need to retrieve large volume of data from WCF Service and also uploading large size of files to the Server. Last week, I was trying to figure out why my WCF service call always threw the generic NotFound exception when trying to retrieve large datasets. Even though, I set buffer limits to 2147483647 (int.MaxValue) in the Silverlight ServiceReferences.ClientConfig file and WCF Service configuration Section under web.config the problem was persisting. I tried so many things from Data Access Layer and UI....

Multiplication Table in SQL Server

Multiplication Table in SQL Server This query gives the multiplication table from 1 to 10. DECLARE @A INT,                   @B INT,                   @C INT,                   @D VARCHAR (100)                   SELECT @A=1                  PRINT ' MULTIPLICATION TABLE 1-10' /****************************************/ /* Created By : Loganathan V */ /* Created On: 20-Sep-2010, Monday */ /* Purpose : Multiplication Table */ /* How to : RUN THE QUERY */ /****************************************/ WHILE (@A<=10) BEGIN   ...

Unity vs MEF in Prism

Prism offering two injection containers named Unity and MEF. Both the containers have their own capabilities. Before choosing the container decide your environment needs. Some of the capabilities provided by both ( Unity & MEF ) containers include the following: Both register types with the container. Both register instances with the container. Both imperatively create instances of registered types. Both inject instances of registered types into constructors. Both inject instances of registered types into properties. Both have declarative attributes for marking types and dependencies that need to be managed. Both resolve dependencies in an object graph. Unity provides several capabilities that MEF does not: Unity resolves concrete types without registration. Unity resolves open generics. Unity uses interception to capture calls to objects and add additional functionality to the target object. MEF provides several capabilities that Unity does not:...

One or more ActiveX controls could not be displayed because..... in Outlook

Some times We've facing this problem in Microsoft Outlook. While trying to add the images to our mails or Opening some emails. 1) Your current security settings prohibit running ActiveX controls on this page, or 2) You have blocked a publisher of one of the controls As a result, the page may not display correctly. To resolve this problem follow these steps. In Microsoft Outlook : Go to Tools > Options > Mail Format > Message Format Check the options " Use MS Office Word to ....". Happy Mailing..........................